Learn how to compare brokerage transfer bonuses using raw return, annualized return, hold periods, ACATS fees, taxes, and account restrictions.

Brokerage transfer bonuses can look a lot better or worse depending on how you calculate them.
A $1,000 bonus sounds great until you realize it requires $500,000 for a full year. A 1% transfer match sounds simple until you see the five-year hold period. A smaller $500 bonus can be more interesting if the hold period is only 90 days and you can move existing ETFs in kind.
The goal is not just to find the biggest advertised bonus. The goal is to figure out what you keep after the hold period, transfer fees, taxes, account restrictions, and opportunity cost.
If you want to run the numbers yourself, use the Ask Sebby brokerage bonus calculators linked below. This post walks through the framework behind those calculators.
Disclosure: Brokerage bonus terms change often. The examples below are based on offers reviewed around publication and are for educational purposes only. Confirm current terms before opening or transferring an account. For financial, investment, tax, or legal advice, talk to a qualified professional.
The simplest way to compare brokerage transfer bonuses is:
Raw bonus rate = bonus amount / required transfer amount
Simple annualized rate = raw bonus rate × (12 months / required hold period)
Net value = bonus value - outgoing transfer fees - incoming transfer fees - annual membership fees - taxes
For example:
My rough baseline is around 0.4% per year for a simple brokerage transfer bonus. Short-hold offers can beat that by a lot. Long-hold offers need either a bigger bonus, better platform fit, or a specific reason you want to keep the account there.
Before comparing rates, check what kind of money the brokerage actually wants.
There are a few different categories:
| Transfer type | What it means | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| ACATS / in-kind transfer | You move existing stocks, ETFs, or other eligible securities from one brokerage to another | Usually avoids selling and keeps market exposure intact |
| Cash deposit | You move cash by ACH, wire, instant transfer, or check | May not work if your assets are already invested |
| IRA rollover or transfer | You move retirement assets | Tax treatment and eligibility rules can be different |
| New cash only | The offer excludes securities transfers | Less useful if you are trying to move existing ETFs |
For larger brokerage bonuses, ACATS transfers are usually the most useful category. ACATS lets you transfer assets like ETFs or stocks between brokerages without selling first. If you hold long-term positions with large unrealized gains, selling just to chase a bonus can create tax consequences that wipe out the benefit.
For example, if you already own VOO, SPY, VTI, or VT as long-term holdings, an in-kind transfer can let you move the same position to a new brokerage, qualify for a transfer bonus, and stay invested during the process.
The bonus itself may still be taxable. The point is that the transfer of the securities generally does not require you to sell the investment just to move accounts.
The raw bonus rate tells you how much the brokerage is paying relative to the amount you need to transfer.
Raw bonus rate = bonus amount / required transfer amount
Here are a few examples:
| Bonus | Required transfer | Raw bonus rate |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | $25,000 | 0.40% |
| $300 | $50,000 | 0.60% |
| $500 | $100,000 | 0.50% |
| $1,000 | $500,000 | 0.20% |
Raw rate is a good starting point, but it is incomplete. A 0.40% bonus with a 3-month hold is very different from a 0.40% bonus with a 5-year hold.
To compare offers with different hold periods, annualize them.
For a simple estimate:
Simple annualized rate = raw bonus rate × (12 / hold period in months)
Examples:
| Raw bonus rate | Hold period | Simple annualized rate |
|---|---|---|
| 0.40% | 3 months | 1.60% |
| 0.50% | 12 months | 0.50% |
| 0.35% | 9 months | 0.47% |
| 1.00% | 5 years | 0.20% |
Annualizing is not perfect. It assumes you can find another comparable offer after the hold period ends. If you are not willing to move assets again, then the raw return may be the more relevant number.
For comparing offers side by side, annualized return is still useful because it tells you how much of your flexibility you are giving up.
A 90-day bonus can be powerful because your assets are free to move again after the hold period. A five-year match can still be useful, but you need to be comfortable keeping the assets there for a long time.
Transfer fees can turn a good offer into a mediocre one, especially at lower balances.
The fee to watch is usually the outgoing ACATS fee from the brokerage you are leaving. Some brokerages charge different amounts for partial and full outgoing transfers. Some charge nothing for partial transfers but a fee for full account transfers.
That creates a common strategy: transfer almost everything out, but leave a small amount behind so the transfer counts as partial. If the old account has no maintenance fee, leaving a few dollars or a small position behind can be cheaper than triggering a full outgoing ACATS fee.
Here is the basic fee math:
Net bonus before tax = bonus amount - transfer-out fee + transfer-fee reimbursement
Example:
| Scenario | Bonus | Transfer-out fee | Reimbursement | Net before tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No fee | $500 | $0 | $0 | $500 |
| $75 outgoing fee | $500 | $75 | $0 | $425 |
| $75 fee reimbursed | $500 | $75 | $75 | $500 |
For larger transfers, a $50 or $75 fee might not change the decision. For a $100 or $150 bonus, it can be a big part of the return.
Also check whether the receiving brokerage reimburses transfer fees. Some do, some do not, and some treat it as case-by-case based on asset level.
Brokerage bonuses are generally taxable. The exact reporting can vary by brokerage and account type, so check the terms and talk to a tax professional if needed.
For a rough after-tax estimate:
After-tax bonus = bonus × (1 - your estimated tax rate)
If you receive a $500 taxable bonus and assume a 30% combined tax rate, the after-tax value is about $350.
That does not automatically make the bonus bad. It just means you should not value the headline number as if it were tax-free cash.
For taxable accounts, the bigger tax issue is usually not the bonus itself. It is whether you are forced to sell appreciated securities to qualify. If the offer accepts in-kind ACATS transfers, you may be able to avoid creating a sale just to move brokerages.
A bonus can look strong in a table and still be useless for your situation.
Check:
This is where a lot of brokerage promos get weird.
For example, an offer might accept cash, securities, and IRAs. Another offer might exclude IRAs. Another might only apply to ACH or wire deposits and exclude ACATS securities transfers. That last category can still be useful, but it is less helpful if your goal is to move existing ETFs without selling.
Hold period is one of the biggest factors.
Shorter hold periods are valuable because you get optionality. If a 90-day offer pays roughly the same raw percentage as a 12-month offer, the 90-day offer is much stronger on an annualized basis.
Longer hold periods can still work, but the offer needs to justify the commitment.
A 1% match over five years is only about 0.20% per year before taxes and fees. That might be fine if you already want the platform and the account fits your long-term setup. It is less exciting if you are giving up the chance to use future limited-time transfer bonuses.
This is why limited-time offers can matter. If a brokerage normally offers a 1% match over five years but occasionally offers 2%, the difference on a large transfer can be meaningful.
On a $5,000,000 transfer:
| Match | Bonus value |
|---|---|
| 1% | $50,000 |
| 2% | $100,000 |
| Difference | $50,000 |
Most people are not transferring $5 million, but the point scales down. If you are locking assets for several years, make sure you are happy with the offer you are taking.
I would group brokerage transfer bonuses into four buckets.
These are usually the most attractive if the terms are reasonable. A 3-month hold with a 0.40% to 1.00% raw return can annualize well.
The tradeoff is that you need to track dates, terms, and transfer fees. If you forget the clawback window or move assets too early, the math can break.
These are the baseline offers. A 0.40% to 0.60% return for a 1-year hold can be reasonable if the platform is solid and the transfer is easy.
I would be more interested at the efficient tiers rather than automatically chasing the largest advertised dollar amount.
These can look strong because 1% is easy to understand. Once you annualize over five years, the return can be closer to 0.20% per year.
That can still work if you want to keep assets there anyway. I would be cautious about moving a large long-term portfolio solely for a 5-year match unless the platform, terms, and future optionality make sense.
Plynk and Silo Markets are different because the value is not just a one-time transfer bonus.
Plynk offers a 25% match on eligible cash dividends, up to $250 per calendar year. If you receive $1,000 in eligible dividends, the 25% match gets you to the $250 cap. With a 3.3% dividend yield, you would need roughly $30,303 of eligible dividend-paying holdings to generate $1,000 in annual dividends. The $250 bonus would be about 0.825% of that portfolio amount before taxes and any other caveats.
Silo Markets is more of an ongoing points model. The math depends on plan fees, eligible balance caps, point value, status reimbursements, and whether future transfer partners are useful. If you value points at 1 cent each, the net return can be modest after the annual fee. If you can redeem points for more value through future transfer partners, the math can improve, but that depends on partners, transfer ratios, and how you personally use the points.
For both, I would treat the calculator as mandatory. The headline offer does not tell you enough.
Let’s say you have $100,000 in ETFs that you can transfer in kind.
| Offer type | Bonus | Hold period | Raw rate | Simple annualized rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1-year bonus | $500 | 12 months | 0.50% | 0.50% | Simple baseline |
| Short-hold bonus | $400 | 3 months | 0.40% | 1.60% | Better if you are willing to move again |
| 5-year match | $1,000 | 5 years | 1.00% | 0.20% | Larger headline, lower annualized rate |
The 5-year match gives you the biggest dollar amount upfront, but it also locks up the account relationship for longer if you want to avoid clawback risk. The 3-month bonus has a smaller dollar amount, but it gives you flexibility much sooner.
This is why I would not rank brokerage bonuses only by advertised bonus size. I would rank them by net annualized value and how much friction they create.
Brokerage transfer bonuses are most attractive if:
This can be especially useful for people with larger taxable portfolios, retirees, or anyone already doing portfolio management a few times per year.
It is less attractive if the bonus requires selling appreciated assets, opening an account you do not want, taking on platform risk, or locking assets for years for a small annualized return.
I would probably skip a brokerage bonus if:
There is also a time-cost element. A $200 bonus can be great if it takes 15 minutes and has low risk. A $1,000 bonus may not be worth it if it creates hours of account issues, rejected transfers, follow-up calls, and tax paperwork.
Here is the full version:
Net value = bonus value + reimbursed transfer fees + usable credits - outgoing transfer fees - incoming transfer fees - annual fees - estimated taxes
Raw net return = net value / required transfer amount
Simple annualized net return = raw net return × (12 / hold period in months)
For ongoing programs, use annual net value instead:
Annual net value = annual rewards + usable credits - annual membership fees - estimated taxes
Annual net return = annual net value / eligible account balance
For points programs, do the math at more than one point valuation:
Point value at 1 cent each
Point value at your conservative travel redemption value
Point value at cash-out floor
If an offer only looks good at an aggressive point valuation, I would be careful. If it works at the cash-out floor and gets better with transfer partners, that is a stronger setup.
A $10,000 bonus can be a low percentage return if it requires millions of dollars. A $200 bonus can be excellent if it only requires $1,000 for 90 days.
A 1% bonus over five years is not the same as a 1% bonus over three months.
Partial and full ACATS fees can be different. Check both before moving assets.
Cash deposits, ACATS transfers, IRA rollovers, and internal transfers are different. Read the terms before assuming your transfer counts.
If a program says travel partners are coming, I would not give full credit until the partners, ratios, and transfer rules are live.
Some securities may have transfer issues. Fractional shares, proprietary mutual funds, crypto, options, margin positions, and managed portfolios can create issues. Keep the move simple when possible.
Brokerage transfer bonuses can be a useful side quest if you already have money invested and can transfer assets in kind.
The best offers are not always the biggest headline numbers. I’d look for strong annualized value, short hold periods, low transfer fees, and terms that match the assets you already own.
For a rough benchmark, I’d want at least 0.4% annualized for a normal brokerage transfer bonus, with higher returns for anything that requires more friction or a longer lockup. Short-hold offers can be much better than they look at first glance, while long-hold matches can be weaker once you spread the bonus over several years.
Use the calculator before moving assets. The right answer depends on your transfer amount, account type, hold period, taxes, transfer fees, and how much you value keeping your portfolio flexible.